SmileBASIC コミュニティプレイ日記12Me23 12Me232017/05/30 02:49:00come on step it up7そうだね 10返信プレイ済み2017/11/04 02:08:12に取得
SmileBASIC コミュニティ返信[2]親投稿Lumage Lumage2017/5/30 3:10"use push until after 50000 cycles, where inc is faster" Confirm low n?0そうだね 未プレイ2017/11/04 02:08:12に取得
SmileBASIC コミュニティ返信[3]親投稿12Me23 12Me232017/5/30 3:34I'm not sure how PUSH could be faster before "50000 cycles" What does that even mean? I tested PUSH S$,"" vs INC S$,"" if they meant PUSH was faster for shorter strings, and INC won by a lot.0そうだね プレイ済み2017/11/04 02:08:12に取得
SmileBASIC コミュニティ返信[4]親投稿smashio XZelda-HolicX2017/5/30 3:43very cool but what is the purpose of this? :0 is it like for faster coding or something like that?0そうだね プレイ済み2017/11/04 02:08:12に取得
SmileBASIC コミュニティ返信[5]親投稿Lumage Lumage2017/5/30 4:00It's just instruction speed comparison.0そうだね 未プレイ2017/11/04 02:08:12に取得
SmileBASIC コミュニティ返信[6]親投稿SıмΞоп SimeonW2017/5/30 7:34STRING$=STRING$+_ it is.0そうだね プレイ済み2017/11/04 02:08:12に取得
SmileBASIC コミュニティ返信[7]親投稿Autz sonic-HD87652017/5/30 8:52It somehow reminds me of that Brain comic meme.0そうだね プレイ済み2017/11/04 02:08:12に取得
SmileBASIC コミュニティ返信[8]親投稿raimondz raimondzz2017/5/30 13:17Is there any drawback of using "INC" instead of "PUSH" for strings?0そうだね プレイ済み2017/11/04 02:08:12に取得
SmileBASIC コミュニティ返信[9]親投稿12Me23 12Me232017/5/30 23:16No, they do the exact same thing. I think INC is faster because it's a keyword instead of a function.1そうだね プレイ済み2017/11/04 02:08:12に取得
SmileBASIC コミュニティ返信[10]親投稿12Me23 12Me232017/5/31 22:15This is a bit unexpected.0そうだね プレイ済み2017/11/04 02:08:12に取得