26 UNTIL WAIT==20 What?? Why are you doing that? Just do a FOR I=1 TO 6:NEXT loop

Ray casting is extremely inefficient, but makes real world graphic effects, are you planning on implementing reflections, where rays will bounce off the 3d object until it hits a solid object

Call it salt salt x) I used to love sugar sugar Now in sugar sugar you can mix different materials, so you should try to figure out a solution to that, it seems pretty difficult with your approach, it might not be possible

interesting, I like the idea but it does seems like it could get really buggy, since pixels turn dead My approach was to split the screen into various sizes In one dimension a 2x2, then another dimension with 4x4 then 8x8... and so on And each cell is a boolean value, 1 if there are pixels in that cell and 0 if there are not With this kind of indexing, i'm expecting high performance, we'll see tho

Holy fuuuuuuuuu

There's no way this is realtime Unless if you discovered some new data structure that uses the graphics as the data

AHH can I see the code You have no idea how long i've been wouking on my version of this What algorithm did you use Does each particle go by circle physics/collision? HOW How do you store the data? Is it 4 arrays (position x, y, velocity x,y)?

Hah, thats pretty cool!

way more advanced, uses gaussian distribution

WOW :o I was making this too

I am extremely impressed How did you get that fractal?

Whoa whoa, wait Did you write the 3D graphics engine??

Is it a raytracer?!

HHOLYY FU**

HOLY CRÅP

oh? this looks interesting

Option 2 by far

Seriously?! 30 seconds is a really long time U gotta find a more efficient method, unless if you wanna annoy the cráp out of your audience

1 pixel off? lol well at least its pixel perfect now I would never be able to notice anything like that

i hear ya