What's the glitch? All I see is a background sheet editor.

Yep. Compiles to SB code.

I didn't forget to pass a parameter. The last variable in a parameter list is automatically assumed to be the object's value. tl;dr 'mysong' is passed automatically.

Now that imports are working, I can start making all the .LIB files for N#! I've made MML.LIB already. Be expecting a full release soon.

Started work on N#'s MML class! This code works perfectly.

Made a few changes. Code looks even more fluent. I'm satisfied. Now for garbage collection and foreach loops.

Can't believe I finally have this running! The N Language is definitely more powerful than SmileBasic.

It is an actual compiler that compiles into SmileBasic. So N code goes in, SB code comes out.

I've been unable to replicate the glitch under controlled circumstances. :/

The Nossrec compiler is becoming VERY complex and advanced: enough so that this program compiles and runs as expected.

As I've already said, "I have entry_main_ as a recursive function as more tests to this glitch."

I have entry_main_ as a recursive function as more tests to this glitch. I realize a stack overflow is inevitable but only if the code would actually work.

My code doesn't work because of interpreter glitches... *sigh*...

Okay, the glitch is not as stable as I'd hoped. Thus, I will have to implement this legitimately. :/

Now introducing Object-Oriented programming for 3DS. Trash collection is next, and then a few more things before Nossrec Beta v1.2 is released.

lol the only reason the compiled version of this program will run is because of a SB interpreter glitch XD. However, it seems to be a stable glitch, so it shall be utilized.

Since Nossrec compiles to SmileBasic, it should theoretically run just as fast. I am also doing this because SB has no classes, private functions, etc. and its syntax is often very ugly. Nossrec resolves 99% of this.

Of course it runs! I'm making a precompiler that compiles Nossrec code into SmileBasic code. This is Nossrec that you see. I like C-style syntax.

Improved support for objects as a variable type!

Not entirely, SimΞon. This code (which I just tested) works as expected by putting "apples" and "pears" on one line.