Preprocessor being stupid today... keeps saying "NEXT WITHOUT FOR 0:33". Only problem? THERE IS NO LINE 33! Or line 0 for that matter...

I kind of see a for without a next, at line 11. You can use "next x" with x being the variable instead of just next. Makes keeping track of multiple nexts easier.

I think the "0" refers to program slot 0. You can hold 4 programs in active memory, numbered 0 to 3. Which blue edit button has a check in it at the bottom of the touchscreen? If it's not 0, tap the edit 0 button and scroll to line 33.

You must have forgot a next or something. Program Slot 0, Line 33. That's what 0:33 means.

I need this NAO

Line 33 just means it hit the end of the program without finding a NEXT. The line number is useless. You have to find the problem yourself. Looks like you are also missing an END for that DEF.

I figured it out by putting a NEXT on that line, and then I understood. Should still say the line that the FOR was on instead, but whatever.

@Abgar "NEXT varname" is illegal in SB; you can't do that anymore.

huh, I've been doing it without errors.

Next varname is fine. Proof:

next without for? Shouldn't that be for without next? Confusing error msg.