You got it. Its Lowerdash! smilebasicsource.com/page?pid=59

Just some balls... D3D3W3RJ

Can you say prototypal inheritance?

@calc84 - F¥♭©√! I allocate that extra byte everywhere. It does feel kinda dirty NOT having parenthesis...

Wondering if singletons are worth the context switching. I could just '_import' plain basic.

@calc84 - Afaik, you cant define a function that takes args and returns nothing. I get syntax errors if I try to call one without assignment, hence "_". me() accesses a copy of the heap data for an instance. right now it's stackless, and just overwrites the last reference.

@toxi - I don't think theres going to be a way around pointer syntax when passing objects... I hope im wrong; but to work everywhere, main included, objects cant have sugar. since objects are functions, you can only pass their references as strings.

PROBABLY

@raimondz - module and export are syntactic sugar for plain old basic. when the program is running, they are not in memory. everyone else - MINECRAFT TOO HARD

After some de-sugaring...

Playing around with a module syntax. What's peeps' first impressions? Everything can be done without the sugar, its just not as pretty...

I'm also hoping someone clues me in on a better way to pass functions.

Its a huge hack (150 lines :p) that uses 2 slots to "compile" the imports and simulate the heap. I'll post code once I clean up the module syntax.

Oops! Looks like I got some OOP in my smileBASIC...