Not that I'm aware of. :(
Perhaps, during creation you could store it in a variable? Otherwise maybe you could DIM it one larger than it needs to be, store some sort of end-of-data as the last value, then at a future point, walk through the array until you find that value?
Another idea is to DIM it one larger than it needs to be and store the lengths in the first elements.
So, if you require a 5 x 10 array, instead of DIM A[5,10], use DIM A[6,11], then store the real data in [1,1] through [5,10], and store the size of the first dimension (5) in [0,1], and the size of the second dimension (10) in [1,0].
Yes, for larger arrays it'll result lots of wasted memory.